我真的在如何将参数传递给Eiffel代理程序调用的第二级方面陷入了困境。希望我的例子足够自我解释:
main_call
do
b (agent d(?, ?))
end
b (a_proc: PROCEDURE[STRING])
local
l_something_else: INTEGER
do
l_something_else := 1
-- z("a_line", a_proc(l_something_else)) -- How can I pass at this stade l_something_else to the d procedure!!!
end
d (line: STRING; something_else: INTEGER)
do
-- do_some_stuff_with_line (line, something_else)
do_nothing
end
z (a_line: STRING; a_proc: PROCEDURE[STRING])
do
a_proc.call([a_line])
end
我本来希望能够做类似的事情
z("a_line", a_proc(?, something_else))
但这是不可能的,因为我尝试使用agent关键字时,无法识别a_proc参数!
那么语法是什么呢?我什至尝试向a_proc添加一个参数,a_proc.set_operands
但被OPEN_ARGS
类弄丢了
如果您需要一个目标...想象一下,我想拥有2个不同的d
函数实现,而在我的情况下UT_CSV_HANDLER
,我想为CVS的每行拥有2个不同的函数
以下代码给出了 Non-compatible actual argument in feature call
Feature: import_from_csv_impl
Called feature: import_from_csv_impl (a_rest_request: REST_REQUEST; a_procedure: PROCEDURE [DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING_8], INTEGER_64, STRING_8]): [detachable like items] detachable SIT_LINKED_LIST [MEASURING_POINT] from MEASURING_POI...
Argument name: ia_name
Argument position: 2
Formal argument type: STRING_8
Actual argument type: INTEGER_64
Line: 258
ia_procedure.call (ia_measuring_point_id, ia_name)
-> end (?, l_measuring_point_id, l_s)
l_csv_handler.read_file (l_is, l_partially_closed)
完整的示例:
-- Main call
import_from_abb_csv (a_rest_request: REST_REQUEST): detachable like items
do
Result := import_from_csv_impl (a_rest_request, agent impl_for_each_csv_line_import_from_abb_csv)
end
-- Second call
import_from_csv_impl (a_rest_request: REST_REQUEST; a_procedure: PROCEDURE[DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING_8], INTEGER_64, STRING]): detachable like items
local
l_csv_handler: UT_CSV_HANDLER
l_is: KL_STRING_INPUT_STREAM
l_measuring_point_id: INTEGER_64
l_s: STRING
l_partially_closed: PROCEDURE[DS_ARRAYED_LIST[STRING]]
do
l_s := "whatever"
l_measuring_point_id := 12
create l_csv_handler.make_with_separator (',')
l_partially_closed := agent (i_al: DS_ARRAYED_LIST[STRING]; ia_measuring_point_id: INTEGER_64; ia_name: STRING; ia_procedure: PROCEDURE[INTEGER_64, STRING])
do
ia_procedure.call (ia_measuring_point_id, ia_name)
end (?, l_measuring_point_id, l_s)
l_csv_handler.read_file (l_is, l_partially_closed)
end
-- end call
impl_for_each_csv_line_import_from_abb_csv (a_csv_line: DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING_8]; a_measuring_point_id: INTEGER_64; l_cu_name: STRING)
do
-- do_my_business
end
-- for information signature of read_file is:
-- read_file (a_file: KI_TEXT_INPUT_STREAM; a_action: PROCEDURE [DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING]])
agent d
或agent d (?,?)
(它们都是等效的)产生一个PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER]
,两个操作数d
仍为开。由于元组协方差,PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER]
符合PROCEDURE [STRING]
,因此实现了a
编译,但是尝试仅使用aTUPLE [STRING]
而不是TUPLE [STRING, INTEGER]
as操作数来调用代理(b
确实如此)会导致运行时异常(可能是catcall)。
逐步关闭代理的操作数的一种方法是将其包装到另一个代理中,并使用一个较少打开的操作数:
b (a_procedure: PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER])
local
l_something_else: INTEGER
l_partially_closed: PROCEDURE [STRING]
do
l_something_else := 1
l_partially_closed := agent (ia_operand_1: STRING; ia_operand_2: INTEGER; ia_procedure: PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER])
do
ia_procedure.call (ia_operand_1, ia_operand_2)
end (?, l_something_else, a_procedure)
-- Notice how only one operand is left open
z ("a_line", l_partially_closed)
end
或者,l_something_else
可以在内联代理中声明:
b (a_procedure: PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER])
local
l_partially_closed: PROCEDURE [STRING]
do
l_partially_closed := agent (ia_operand_1: STRING; ia_procedure: PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER])
local
il_something_else: INTEGER
do
il_something_else := 1
ia_procedure.call (ia_operand_1, il_something_else)
end (?, a_procedure)
z ("a_line", l_partially_closed)
end
您也可以使用{ROUTINE}.set_operands
and {ROUTINE}.apply
,但是我认为它不那么灵活,更容易出错,而且不是线程安全的。
b (a_procedure: PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER])
local
l_something_else: INTEGER
l_partially_closed: PROCEDURE [STRING]
do
l_something_else := 1
a_procedure.set_operands ("some string you will override later", l_something_else)
z ("a_line", a_procedure)
end
z (a_line: STRING; a_proc: PROCEDURE [STRING]) -- or PROCEDURE [STRING, INTEGER]
do
-- You have no guarantee that `a_proc' has any operands set (though you could make it a precondition)
-- This is why it is less safe and less reusable than the previous approach
check attached a_proc.operands as la_operands then
la_operands [1] = a_line
end
a_proc.apply
end
给定您的实现案例,请参见以“ HERE”开头的注释:
-- Main call
import_from_abb_csv (a_rest_request: REST_REQUEST): detachable like items
do
Result := import_from_csv_impl (a_rest_request, agent impl_for_each_csv_line_import_from_abb_csv)
end
-- Second call
import_from_csv_impl (a_rest_request: REST_REQUEST;
a_procedure: PROCEDURE[DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING_8], INTEGER_64, STRING]): detachable like items
local
l_csv_handler: UT_CSV_HANDLER
l_is: KL_STRING_INPUT_STREAM
l_measuring_point_id: INTEGER_64
l_s: STRING
l_partially_closed: PROCEDURE[DS_ARRAYED_LIST[STRING]]
do
l_s := "whatever"
l_measuring_point_id := 12
create l_csv_handler.make_with_separator (',')
l_partially_closed := agent (i_al: DS_ARRAYED_LIST[STRING];
ia_measuring_point_id: INTEGER_64;
ia_name: STRING;
ia_procedure: PROCEDURE[DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING_8], INTEGER_64, STRING]) -- HERE, change the declared type of `ia_procedure' to match `a_procedure'
do
ia_procedure.call (i_al, ia_measuring_point_id, ia_name) -- HERE, add `i_al' to `call'
end (?, l_measuring_point_id, l_s, a_procedure) -- HERE, add `a_procedure'
l_csv_handler.read_file (l_is, l_partially_closed)
end
-- end call
impl_for_each_csv_line_import_from_abb_csv (a_csv_line: DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING_8]; a_measuring_point_id: INTEGER_64; l_cu_name: STRING)
do
-- do_my_business
end
-- for information signature of read_file is:
-- read_file (a_file: KI_TEXT_INPUT_STREAM; a_action: PROCEDURE [DS_ARRAYED_LIST [STRING]])
本文收集自互联网,转载请注明来源。
如有侵权,请联系 [email protected] 删除。
我来说两句