我在名为“ y ”的列表中有大约28000个数字的列表,并且正在API上运行for循环以发送消息,但这需要花费大量时间(准确地说是每次调用1.2797秒)
码:
import timeit
start = timeit.default_timer()
for i in y:
data = {'From': 'XXXX', 'To': str(i),
'Body': "ABC ABC" }
requests.post('https://xxxx:[email protected]/v1/Accounts/xxx/Sms/send',data=data)
stop = timeit.default_timer()
print('Time: ', stop - start)
我该如何减少时间?
Asyncio或Multithreading是优化代码的两种可能的解决方案,并且两者基本上都在后台执行相同的操作:
import timeit
import threading
import time
y = list(range(50))
def post_data(server, data, sleep_time=1.5):
time.sleep(sleep_time)
# request.post(server, data=data)
start = timeit.default_timer()
server = 'https://xxxx:[email protected]/v1/Accounts/xxx/Sms/send'
threads = []
for i in y:
# if you don't need to wait for your threads don't hold them in memory after they are done and instead do
# threading.Thread(target, args).start()
# instead. Especially important if you want to send a large number of messages
threads.append(threading.Thread(target=post_data,
args=(server, {'From': 'XXXX', 'To': str(i), 'Body': "ABC ABC"}))
threads[-1].start()
for thread in threads:
# optional if you want to wait for completion of the concurrent posts
thread.join()
stop = timeit.default_timer()
print('Time: ', stop - start)
import timeit
import asyncio
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
y = list(range(50)
_executor = ThreadPoolExecutor(len(y))
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
def post_data(server, data, sleep_time=1.5):
time.sleep(sleep_time)
# request.post(server, data=data)
async def post_data_async(server, data):
return await loop.run_in_executor(_executor, lambda: post_data(server, data))
async def run(y, server):
return await asyncio.gather(*[post_data_async(server, {'From': 'XXXX', 'To': str(i), 'Body': "ABC ABC"})
for i in y])
start = timeit.default_timer()
server = 'https://xxxx:[email protected]/v1/Accounts/xxx/Sms/send'
loop.run_until_complete(run(y, server))
stop = timeit.default_timer()
print('Time: ', stop - start)
当使用不支持异步但可以从并发中获利的API时(如您的用例),我倾向于使用线程,因为它更易于理解IMHO。如果您的API /库确实支持asyncio,那就去吧!这很棒!
在我的包含50个元素的列表的机器上,asyncio解决方案在运行时运行1.515秒,而线程解决方案在执行50个实例时需要大约1.509秒time.sleep(1.5)
。
本文收集自互联网,转载请注明来源。
如有侵权,请联系 [email protected] 删除。
我来说两句